特朗普譴責沃爾瑪“不懂政治”,借關(guān)稅為借口提高價格危害美國人民
‘Can’t bully the market’: Trump throws temper tantrum at Walmart after his tariffs cause price hikes
譯文簡介
前密蘇里州民主黨參議員克萊爾·麥卡斯基爾、《經(jīng)濟學人》執(zhí)行主編夏洛特·霍華德和彭博新聞社主播兼記者大衛(wèi)·古拉與妮可·華萊士一起做客《Deadline White House》節(jié)目,對唐納德·特朗普關(guān)稅政策的持續(xù)影響做出回應。該政策徹底顛覆了美國經(jīng)濟,導致穆迪下調(diào)美國信用評級,沃爾瑪?shù)却蠊颈黄忍岣呙绹M者的價格。
正文翻譯

Claire McCaskill, former Democratic Senator from Missouri, Charlotte Howard, Executive Editor for The Economist and David Gura, Anchor and Correspondent for Bloomberg News join Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House with reaction to the continued fallout from Donald Trump’s tariff policy which has turned the American upside down, caused Moody’s to downgrade the United States credit rating, and major companies like Walmart being forced to raise prices on the American consumers. Recently, President Trump publicly criticized Walmart for raising prices under the pretext of tariffs.
前密蘇里州民主黨參議員克萊爾·麥卡斯基爾、《經(jīng)濟學人》執(zhí)行主編夏洛特·霍華德和彭博新聞社主播兼記者大衛(wèi)·古拉與妮可·華萊士一起做客《Deadline White House》節(jié)目,對唐納德·特朗普關(guān)稅政策的持續(xù)影響做出回應。該政策徹底顛覆了美國經(jīng)濟,導致穆迪下調(diào)美國信用評級,沃爾瑪?shù)却蠊颈黄忍岣呙绹M者的價格。
最近,特朗普總統(tǒng)公開譴責沃爾瑪以關(guān)稅為借口提高價格。
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 6 )
收藏
Increasing tax on the poor and middle class always wrecks the economy.
增加對貧困階層和中產(chǎn)階級的稅收總是會毀掉經(jīng)濟。
@michaelhapgood782
Lie. Have you read the budget in the new bill.
謊言。你讀過新法案中的預算嗎?
@kathyanderson4962
Not to mention how trump admin has treated people with vile, extreme cruelty & disrespect. Abhorrent??
更不用說特朗普政府如何以惡毒、極端的殘忍和不尊重對待人民。令人厭惡??
@missanthrope2
The big plan raise the price of home repairs fire the workers free property from the poverty
計劃提高房屋修理費用,解雇工人,解救貧困中的財產(chǎn)。
@creesauce
@kathyanderson4962you’re a commie, leave.
你是個共產(chǎn)主義者,離開吧。
@TheChopf26
Thats not happening though.....
不過這并沒有發(fā)生……
@samcast2934
tRump is an embarrassment to the USA. These MAGA people are nuts! Why do the poor and middle class think Billionaires are looking out for them? WHY!!!!!!!!!?
特朗普是美國的恥辱。這些MAGA支持者真瘋狂!為什么貧窮和中產(chǎn)階級認為億萬富翁會關(guān)心他們?為什么?。。。。?!
@Lord_Victis
@michaelhapgood782 where if you make less than 360,000 a year, you pay more in taxes?
如果你年收入低于36萬美元,為什么你要繳更多的稅?
@spudsmackenzie13
@michaelhapgood782maga troll.. who will try to sanesplain anything that Trump does….
MAGA巨魔……誰都會試圖為特朗普辯解……
@creesauce
@ the Marxist left doesn’t live in reality.
馬克思主義左派活在虛擬現(xiàn)實中。
@Dannochio
@michaelhapgood782lololol
哈哈哈
@sergeant_salty
Taxing imports is not "Taxing the poor"
征收進口稅并不是“窮人稅”
@jimbrennan1181
You are correct, increasing taxes on everyone but the rich always leads to disaster. The poor and middle class spend their money (pretty much all of it) but the rich tuck it away, and "trickle down economics" is a theory but not a reality. Putting a burden on the non-rich will cause them to spend less. What Trump's doing with the economy is a "perfect storm" of disaster. It will increase the costs of goods (inflation), cause people to spend less, cause other countries to buy less (recession), and lead to companies downsizing which equates increased unemployment which goes right back to people spending less.
你是對的,增加對除了富人之外所有人的稅收總是會導致災難。窮人和中產(chǎn)階級花掉他們的錢(幾乎全部),而富人則把它藏起來,“涓滴經(jīng)濟學”是一個理論,但不是現(xiàn)實。加重非富人群體的負擔會導致他們消費減少。特朗普對經(jīng)濟的操作就是一場“完美的風暴”災難。它會增加商品成本(通貨膨脹),導致人們消費減少,導致其他國家購買減少(經(jīng)濟衰退),并導致公司裁員,進而造成失業(yè)增加,這會讓人們的消費進一步減少。
@PatrioticUSAmerican
You are spreading DISINFORMATION. REPORTED!!!
你在傳播虛假信息。已舉報?。?!
@Delco8913
@Lord_VictisYou mean like Obama and Biden promised
你是指像奧巴馬和拜登承諾的那樣?
@tomsenft7434
@TheHopetownTrump supporters wish cancer upon others. That's why you vote for the destruction of Healthcare. I suspect you smoke cigarettes.
特朗普支持者希望別人得癌癥。這就是你們支持摧毀醫(yī)療保健的原因。我懷疑你抽煙。
@jennifershanks453
@TheChopf26 it looks like if you make $50,000 a year you can expect to pay 1500 more in taxes
看起來如果你年收入5萬美元,你可能需要多繳1500美元的稅。
@Lord_Victis
@Delco8913 no Biden used trumps tax budget soooo....
Go sit down simpleton. You got conned.
不,拜登用了特朗普的稅收預算,所以......
去坐下吧,傻瓜。你被愚弄了。
@jennifershanks453
@sergeant_saltyit does disproportionately hurt the poor and smaller businesses.
這確實不成比例地傷害了窮人和小企業(yè)。
@Lord_Victis
@TheChopf26 weird how it is. I mean the Republicans denied cutting Medicare but they are doing that too.
Are you dumb or just stupid?
真奇怪。我的意思是,共和黨否認削減醫(yī)療保險,但他們也在做這件事。
你是傻還是愚蠢?
@Lord_Victis
@TheHopetown and Donny is just stupid. You even more so for believing him
還有唐尼就是傻。你更傻,因為你相信他。
@sergeant_salty
@jennifershanks453 if you're so desperate for the cheapest Chinese products you can buy, just move to China
如果你這么渴望購買最便宜的中國商品,就搬到中國去吧。
@jrs55555
@sergeant_saltyTaxing imports is taxing the buyer. Even kindergarten kids know that. Thanks for actually proving Trumplings aren’t intelligent enough to know that.
征收進口稅就是在向購買者征稅。連幼兒園的孩子都知道這一點。感謝你證明了特朗普的支持者智商不夠,連這個都不知道。
@jimbrennan1181
@sergeant_salty The "Big Beautiful Bill" decreases taxes for the rich and increases taxes for the poor. That's "Taxing the poor". Prove me wrong!
這部“美麗的偉大法案”減少了富人的稅收,增加了窮人的稅收。那就是“征稅窮人”。證明我錯了!
@dragonfliesnh4204
@jimbrennan1181 You explained this very well! I don't understand how the cult can be so willfully ignorant, especially when we have all of the information and evidence from the internet at our fingertips all day long. On top of everything you said, almost half of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and one financial emergency can put them in debt for years. Many with low income, those with disabilities, the elderly, etc will not survive! People won't have anything to spare to help their local food pantries and financial assistance will dry up very quickly.
你解釋得很好!我不明白為什么這個邪教如此故意無知,尤其是當我們隨時可以通過互聯(lián)網(wǎng)獲取所有的信息和證據(jù)時。除此之外,幾乎一半的美國人都在靠薪水生活,一場財務緊急情況就可能讓他們負債多年。很多低收入者、殘疾人、老人等都無法生存!人們將沒有任何剩余來幫助當?shù)氐氖称枫y行,財政援助也會很快枯竭。
@PatrioticUSAmerican
@jimbrennan1181 - The Democrats continue to LIE to the American Public. That's the reason behind their 21% Nation-wide approval rating.
民主黨繼續(xù)對美國公眾撒謊。這就是他們?nèi)珖鴥H有21%的支持率的原因。
@sergeant_salty
@jimbrennan1181 it's amazing how confident DemoKKKrats are when they're lying
民主黨人在撒謊時真是令人驚訝地自信。
@sergeant_salty
@dragonfliesnh4204 3 weeks ago you said the shelves would be empty in 3 weeks. Where did you get your economics degree?
三周前你說三周內(nèi)貨架會空。你是在哪兒拿到的經(jīng)濟學學位?
@OVERDINNER
That's why Trump proposed NO imcome tax for earners making less than $200,000 a year. Legislation has been proposed to study TDS. Are you on the list?
這就是為什么特朗普提出對年收入低于20萬美元的收入者免征所得稅。已經(jīng)提出立法研究特朗普崇拜綜合癥(TDS)。你在名單上嗎?
@dragonfliesnh4204
@sergeant_salty Shelves are ALREADY going bare in many places and the prices are hiking! Things are constantly out of stock when ordering online. Just because it's not that way where you are, it doesn't mean it's like that everywhere.
許多地方的貨架已經(jīng)空了,價格也在上漲!網(wǎng)上購物時常常缺貨。僅僅因為你所在的地方不是那樣,不代表其他地方也一樣。
@Ephimerous2006
@TheHopetown Everything you send with your right hand will come back to you two fold, on the left hand!
你用右手送出的所有東西,都會以雙倍的方式回到你左手!
fjdt the psychotic mythomaniac klown!!!
That's your self proclaimed god!
這個精神病妄想狂小丑?。。?br /> 那就是你自稱的神!
@Ephimerous2006
@OVERDINNER fdjt the tucken frump klown act!
讓那個躲起來的特朗普小丑表演!
@creesauce
@ the Marxist left hates facts
馬克思主義左派討厭事實
@lovesthewind
@michaelhapgood782 You clearly have no clue about how it works.
你顯然完全不懂它是怎么運作的。
@DDKaraokeOutlaw
@OVERDINNER tds: A diagnosable medical condition in which the afflicted blindly follows trump, a.k.a. "The Chosen One." The afflicted is incapable of free thought, unable to critically uate the actions or any criticism of "Dear Leader," or otherwise accurately perceive the world around them. The mindless adoration of trump is so intense as to impairs the person’s judgment. Additional symptoms include blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and deference to verifiable facts, as opposed to whatever "Dear Leader" or HIS surrogates tell them to believe.
TDS:一種可診斷的疾病狀況,患者盲目追隨特朗普,也就是所謂的“被選中的人”?;颊邿o法獨立思考,無法批判性地評估“親愛的領(lǐng)導人”的行為或任何批評,無法準確感知周圍的世界。
對特朗普的盲目崇拜如此強烈,以至于影響了患者的判斷。其他癥狀還包括盲目仇恨那些宣揚寬容和尊重可驗證事實的人,而不是聽從“親愛的領(lǐng)導人”或他的代理人告訴他們相信的東西。
@lovesthewind
@TheHopetown what you wish for others will come back at you.
你希望別人遭遇的事情終將回到你自己身上。
@lovesthewind
@sergeant\\\\_salty It's taxing everyone who purchases them. Get a clue.
這就是對每一個購買這些商品的人征稅。明白了嗎?
@Chill\\\\_Xer
@sergeant\\\\_salty Wrong. Not only does it increase the price to the consumer at the point of sale, it also increases the amount of sales tax charged at the point of sale. A double whammy for the consumer!
錯了。不僅在銷售點提高了商品價格,還增加了銷售稅的征收。對消費者來說是雙重打擊!
@habitant71
@michaelhapgood782 Yup, he's a communist!!! That's what authoritarian diaper wearing Donnie is!!! He's going to bankrupt a country, his math doesn't add up, but then again his voters like you aren't too bright
是的,他是個共產(chǎn)主義者?。?!那就是穿尿布的專制主義者唐尼?。?!他將使一個國家破產(chǎn),他的數(shù)學算不對,但他的選民像你一樣并不聰明。
@Bob-z9d-w8k
@michaelhapgood782 Tariffs are regressive so they're correct. Tariffs are a tax on goods so lower income who spend most of their money on goods are taxed on essentially all their income. Rich people cannot physically spend all their money on goods so the tax only applies to the 1% of their income that goes to buying goods. So the effective tax rate of the tariffs is much higher as a percentage on lower income people. I don't expect you to understand this but that is the explanation
關(guān)稅是累退性的,所以它們是正確的。關(guān)稅是對商品的稅收,因此對大部分把錢花在商品上的低收入人群來說,實際上是在對幾乎所有收入征稅。富人不會把所有的錢都花在商品上,因此稅收僅適用于他們1%的收入。因此,關(guān)稅的實際稅率在低收入人群中占比更高。
我不指望你能理解,但這是解釋。
@Chill\\\\_Xer
@jimbrennan1181It also has the double-whammy of increasing the amount of sales tax charged at the point of sale, so a widget that costs 100 dollars plus 4% sales tax =\\\\$104 with 30% becomes 130 dollars + 4% sales tax = \\\\$135.20
它還有雙重打擊的效果——提高了銷售稅額,因此一個售價100美元并加收4%銷售稅的商品,原本是104美元,征收30%的稅后則變成130美元,再加上4%的銷售稅,最終價格為135.20美元。
@moki123g
@michaelhapgood782 I read the budget in the last one. The cuts for the little people expired. The cuts for the rich and the corporations didn't. The last one did nothing unless you made over 400k. How about you get out of your little republican reality distortion field and see what is really happening.
我讀過上一次的預算案。普通人的減稅已經(jīng)到期,而富人和公司的減稅并沒有到期。上一次的減稅什么都沒有做,除非你賺超過40萬。你不如走出你那片小小的共和黨現(xiàn)實扭曲領(lǐng)域,看看真正發(fā)生了什么。
@moki123g
@sergeant\\\\_salty Typical red hat, ignorant to the core. That is exactly what it does.
典型的紅帽子,愚昧到底。那就是它的作用。
@kpokpojiji
@michaelhapgood782 I have. And it will indeed, over time, increase taxes on the poor, working and middle class.
我讀過了。并且,隨著時間推移,它確實會增加對貧困、工人和中產(chǎn)階級的稅收。
@kpokpojiji
@sergeant\\\\_salty Yes. Putting tariffs on imports is disproportionately taxing the poor. The price increases with take up more of a percentage of the lower income groups than the rich. It is a regressive tax.
是的,對進口商品加征關(guān)稅無比例地加重了窮人的負擔。價格上漲對低收入群體占據(jù)的比例大于富人。這是一種累退稅。
@damondelgado4603
@michaelhapgood782 your "lie" comment got 2 likes
你的“謊言”評論得到了2個點贊。
@FrankSmith-kg3dh
BUT MA GA IS SO NUMB THEY THINK ITS GREAT
但是MAGA支持者麻木到以為這是好事。
@kpokpojiji
@sergeant\\\\_salty We are beginning to see shortages on the shlves in various domains. This will obviously not happen all at once, and will be more apparent as supplies dry up. We are already seeing decreases in trucking and stevadore work.
我們開始看到各個領(lǐng)域的貨架出現(xiàn)短缺。這顯然不會一下子發(fā)生,但隨著供應枯竭,會變得越來越明顯。我們已經(jīng)看到了卡車運輸和裝卸工工作量的減少。
@sergeant\\\\_salty
So strange how the anti-tariff crowd was the pro-tariff crowd when Biden was in office I guess tariffs are only bad when Trump does it
真奇怪,反對關(guān)稅的群體在拜登執(zhí)政時變成了支持關(guān)稅的群體。我猜只有當特朗普做的時候,關(guān)稅才是壞的。
@ButterBuns00
MAGA bots are drunk on the Orange kool-aid
MAGA機器人喝醉了橙色的冷飲。
@kpokpojiji
@OVERDINNERTrump can propose all he wants for his base, knowing that the house will not pass it. Congress writes the bills, not Trump.
特朗普可以為他的支持者提出任何他想要的提案,但他知道國會不會通過這些法案。是國會起草法案,而不是特朗普。
@michaelhapgood782
@moki123g That's a lie. Trumps tax cuts are extended in the bill. No tax on tips. No Tax on SSI, No Tax on overtime.
Interest deduction on financing of American made cars.
Plus A new tax bracket added 40% on income of \\\\$700,000 or more
up from 37% Stop your lies.
那是謊言。特朗普的減稅政策在法案中得到了延續(xù)。小費免稅。社會保障收入免稅。加班收入免稅。
美國制造汽車的貸款利息可抵稅。
此外,還增加了新的稅檔,對年收入超過70萬美元的征收40%的稅率
從37%上調(diào)。別再撒謊了。
@sergeant\\\\_salty
@kpokpojiji WHERE? Where are you seeing it? I want proof. Everywhere I go the shops are stocked. Grocery stores, hardware stores, electronics stores, convenience stores... all stocked
哪里?你在哪兒看到的?我想要證據(jù)。無論我去哪里,商店的貨架都很充實。超市、五金店、電子商店、便利店……貨架上都有貨。
@davidvanbrunt4233:
@michaelhapgood782 TDS
特朗普辯護者綜合癥(TDS)。
@thesmartestazzofall:
funny how Trump is proposing a 15% tax decrease, savings accounts for any and every newborn American Citizen and Dems and some republs are against it. and for trying to call Walmart - whose one of the most profitable corporations in the world to stop being greedy - dems here are trying to make that look like a bad thing. Part of me wishes Dems could go back to the economy Joe Biden and his handlers created where EVERYTHING soared to higher prices. If thats what you want - I say give it to them dems
有趣的是,特朗普提議將稅率降低15%,為每一個新出生的美國公民設(shè)立儲蓄賬戶,而民主黨和一些共和黨人對此表示反對。而且,民主黨人試圖讓沃爾瑪——全球最賺錢的公司之一——停止貪婪,看起來像是壞事。我的一部分希望民主黨人能回到喬·拜登和他的幕僚創(chuàng)造的經(jīng)濟環(huán)境,在那里一切價格飛漲。如果你們想要那樣的經(jīng)濟,我說,給他們吧,民主黨。
@vforwombat9915:
@michaelhapgood782 not a lie. they're talking about the tariffs.
不是謊言,他們在說的是關(guān)稅。
@vforwombat9915:
@Lord\\\\_Victis err, the tariffs are a tax increase on the poor and middle class.
嗯,關(guān)稅是對貧困和中產(chǎn)階級的稅收增加。
@LorraineFisher-p3d:
Yeah, hateful attitudes like racism make it a lot easier for the Moneymen to manipulate folks as well??
是的,像種族主義這樣的仇恨態(tài)度讓金錢大亨更容易操控人們。
@vforwombat9915:
@sergeant\\\\_salty "Taxing imports is not "Taxing the poor"
征稅進口商品并不是‘窮人稅’?!?br />
@vforwombat9915:
considering the poor pay for it, it is.
考慮到窮人要為此付費,那它就是。
@MichaelWhitted-n3n:
@TheHopetown English. DO YOU SPEAK IT?!!!!!
英語。你會說嗎?!!!!!
@tim3172:
@sergeant\\\\_salty It *literally* is. MAGAts and the poor survive off cheap, imported goods.
這 *確實* 是。MAGA派和貧困群體依賴廉價的進口商品生存。
@tim3172:
@sergeant\\\\_salty There are *massive*, sweeping reports of empty shelves all across the US.
美國各地有關(guān)于空貨架的大規(guī)模報告。
@tim3172:
@OVERDINNER When did he sign that into law? Oh, right... more false promises. He already gave up on "no tax on tips".
他什么時候簽署那個成為法律的?哦,對...更多虛假承諾。他已經(jīng)放棄了“不對小費征稅”。
@commonsense6967:
@michaelhapgood782Yes, but you should read it.
是的,但你應該讀一下。
@commonsense6967:
@OVERDINNERHaha…you are imagining things.
哈哈...你在空想。
@ellennoble2134:
In regards to Congress's inaction, Claire McCaskill hit the nail on the head when she said"They want their jobs more than their integrity"!!!
關(guān)于國會的不作為,克萊爾·麥卡斯基爾一針見血地說:“他們更看重自己的工作,而非自己的正直”!?。?br />
@skippylippy547:
Congress is a filthy cesspool of criminals who work to enrich themselves.
國會是一個骯臟的犯罪溫床,議員們在里面為自己謀取私利。
@i-Maven:
The irony is, if they keep supporting and backing his bs, they will make THEMSELVES obsolete.
諷刺的是,如果他們繼續(xù)支持和背后支持他的廢話,他們將使自己變得過時。
@davidg3944:
rump has a gift of choosing the worst possible people, from his "spokes-things" to his cabinet members. The worst of America inhabits the White House.
特朗普有一種選擇最糟糕人選的天賦,從他的“發(fā)言人”到他的內(nèi)閣成員。美國最糟糕的人住進了白宮。
@denniscolley5290:
The pay is better.........
薪水更高.........
@Cugastratos:
And in the e d, because they let go of their integrity...they'll lose their jobs.
最后,因為他們放棄了正直...他們將失去工作。
@user-wc5lw7ps6h1:
Congress is doing a great job.
國會做得很好。
@hjsn1572:
People really don't understand how bad it is to drop from a AAA status.
人們真的不明白從AAA評級下降是多么糟糕。
@Lothar.Dittzx-1:
Never forget, tariffs ARE taxes!
永遠不要忘記,關(guān)稅就是稅收!
@Bruno-y8j8y:
Donald Trumps seventh bankruptcy is about to become a reality.
唐納德·特朗普的第七次破產(chǎn)即將成為現(xiàn)實。
@reason6835:
Yes they are. Just like taxing rich people and corporations, they pass the cost onto the consumer and hurt the economy.
是的,它們就是。就像對富人和公司征稅一樣,最終他們把成本轉(zhuǎn)嫁給消費者,傷害了經(jīng)濟。
@first-i4y:
TRUMP TAXES
特朗普稅收
@SissyAustin:
Tariff is just another word for tax.
關(guān)稅只是稅收的另一種說法。
@trentalpha7749:
@reason6835oh boy! You are so misinformed
哎呀!你真是被誤導了。
@WilliamMacdonald-bd7pv:
America is SCRWED when they elected a convicted criminal, the sadest thing is Americans knew all about the man's character,
美國在選舉了一個被定罪的罪犯后完蛋了,最悲哀的是美國人早就知道這個人的品行。
@mazenling4292:
Tariff=Trump= tax on consumers.
關(guān)稅=特朗普=對消費者的稅收。
@SissyAustin:
@WilliamMacdonald-bd7pvabsolutely. Shame on every American that voted for this Shitshow.
絕對如此。對每個投票給這個混亂局面的美國人感到羞恥。
@Warfighter6900:
And historically fking us over. Not any longer, despite what liberal media is saying. I can’t believe you fools believe what these MSNBC idiots are feeding you.
而且歷史上一直在坑我們?,F(xiàn)在不再如此,盡管自由派媒體說什么。我簡直不敢相信你們這些傻瓜相信這些MSNBC傻逼們給你們灌輸?shù)臇|西。
@Warfighter6900:
Liberals love taxes so they should be happy in their white guilt and gender confusion.
自由派喜歡稅收,所以他們應該在他們的白人罪疚感和性別困惑中感到高興。
@Warfighter6900:
@Bruno-y8j8ygod you’re dumb.
天啊,你真傻。
@banderson8444:
@reason6835
You are correct about Trump's Tariffs (a Federal tax) will be paid by US consumers
Please explain how they (rich individuals) pass their tax rate increase to everyone else.
A rate increase on corporations may mean smaller dividends for stock holders and those companies can't buy back their own stock like they did when Trump lowered their tax rate in 2017.
Those corporate rate cuts did NOT lead to lower prices to consumer p
On their products
你說的對,特朗普的關(guān)稅(聯(lián)邦稅)將由美國消費者支付
請解釋一下他們(富人)如何將稅率提高轉(zhuǎn)嫁給其他人。
對公司征稅的增稅可能意味著股東得到的股息減少,這些公司也不能像特朗普在2017年降低稅率時那樣回購自己的股票。
這些公司稅率的削減并沒有導致消費者產(chǎn)品價格降低。
@scottbigler9182:
Never forget… no tariffs on American made.
永遠不要忘記... 美國制造的產(chǎn)品沒有關(guān)稅。
@Mathew-8896:
@reason6835 "We’re going to be a tariff nation. It’s not going to be a cost to you. It’s going to be a cost to another country,” Trump told supporters at a Wisconsin campaign rally in September.
“我們將成為一個征收關(guān)稅的國家。這不會對你們產(chǎn)生成本,而是對另一個國家產(chǎn)生成本,”特朗普在九月的威斯康星州競選集會上告訴支持者。
@solarmantint1965:
Also don't forget, that every single country in the world that has been taking advantage of us for decades is no longer going to be able to do so, every single country at least close to every single country is wanting to take what they're charging us down to zero,.. Andrew Joe Biden the average household take-home pay decreased by 4200, especially when you figure in inflation, under President Trump and his new bill, the average household is actually going to have over 13,000 more dollars of spendable income!!!?
另外不要忘記,世界上每一個長期占我們便宜的國家都不再能夠繼續(xù)這樣做,幾乎每一個國家都希望將他們對我們的收費降低到零...在喬·拜登總統(tǒng)下,平均家庭收入下降了4200美元,特別是考慮到通貨膨脹,在特朗普總統(tǒng)和他的最新法案下,平均家庭實際上將多出13,000美元的可支配收入?。?!
@honenz:
How else is Chump supposed to pay for corporate & millionaire tax cuts?
否則特朗普怎么支付企業(yè)和百萬富翁的減稅呢?
@BEYONDCOGENT:
Lothar, Always remember that paying your student LOANS is important and is a tariff on Americans if you don't pay your OWN bills!!!
永遠記得還清你的學生貸款很重要,如果你不還自己的賬單,那就是對美國人的關(guān)稅?。?!
@BEYONDCOGENT:
@SissyAustinOr not paying your student LOANS
或者不還你的學生貸款。
@ceciliag0094:
@scottbigler9182 I guess we will just overlook the plants and businesses that are already having to lay off AMERICAN employees because of tariffs. MAGA always tries to make things “common sense” and in the process screws themselves and everyone else over by not thinking anything through past step one. Pretty much nothing in the states has everything single aspect of it that can be manufactured in the states. Something always has to be imported. That something will be tariffed, even if the final product is “made in the US”. Try again.
我猜你們會直接忽略那些因為關(guān)稅而被迫解雇美國員工的工廠和企業(yè)。MAGA總想把事情搞得“理所當然”,結(jié)果卻因為從不深入思考第一步之后的步驟,把自己和所有人都坑慘了。
美國幾乎沒有任何產(chǎn)品能完全做到每個零部件都在本土制造,總有些東西需要進口。而這些進口部件依然會被加征關(guān)稅——哪怕最終產(chǎn)品打著“美國制造”的標簽。再好好想想吧。
@dilmeral:
@reason6835 So ridiculous I can’t even
真是荒謬,我甚至無法理解。
@YoureAFkinMoron:
@user-jb0123 you're just pointing out your own stupidity here. not exactly stating what you thought you were, eh?
你只是在指出你自己的愚蠢。并沒有完全說出你原本想說的東西,是吧?
@dilmeral:
@SissyAustin if it was not why he screams at Walmart to eat them
如果不是,為什么他要對沃爾瑪大喊讓他們?nèi)ニ溃?br />
@dilmeral:
I think they are willingly accepting all the lies they are told to. Such a pathetic illness\\\\@trentalpha7749
我認為他們愿意接受所有告訴他們的謊言。這種病態(tài)真是可悲
@sergeant\\\\_salty:
But Democrats have been begging for higher corporate tax rates.... now you don't want the corporations to pay more?
但是民主黨一直在乞求提高公司稅率...現(xiàn)在你不想讓公司繳更多的稅嗎?
@dilmeral:
We have to forget about any sensible or even fair thought about anything from a cult member. I don’t even believe they are real people be side nobody can be that dumb @banderson8444
我們得忘掉任何來自邪教成員的理智或公平的想法。我甚至不相信他們是現(xiàn)實中的人,因為沒有人能那么傻
@albertnielsen1154:
*Yes*
tariffs are sales taxes - who pays sales taxes, buyer or seller?
*是的*
關(guān)稅就是銷售稅——銷售稅是買方還是賣方支付?
@dilmeral:
count the products in your house that are American made than come write here @scottbigler9182
數(shù)一數(shù)你家里有多少是美國制造的,然后再來這里
@ChristineJameson-ly2pe:
@mazenling4292tariffs should be now called the Trump Tax!
關(guān)稅現(xiàn)在應該稱為特朗普稅!
@lotus956:
This is why Trump likes the word tariff so much. It’s a tax without saying tax.
這就是特朗普喜歡使用“關(guān)稅”這個詞的原因。這是一個沒有直接說“稅”的稅收。
@rossi5839:
His supporters think someone from another country else pays them
他的支持者認為其他國家的人會為他們支付。
@brianmitchelldmd7279:
@scottbigler9182where do I get an American made laptop?
我在哪里可以買到美國制造的筆記本電腦?
@scottbigler9182:
@brianmitchelldmd7279Apple has already committed to produce from the U.S.
蘋果公司已經(jīng)承諾在美國生產(chǎn)。
@Stormstorm1:
@scottbigler9182
Like that cell phone you're on right now, right?? Smh
就像你現(xiàn)在使用的手機,對吧??無語。
@pedrofleury3931:
In Brazilian tax law, an import tariff is formally classified as a tax. It is incredible that so many people have been fooled by this con man
在巴西稅法中,進口關(guān)稅正式被歸類為稅收。令人難以置信的是,竟然有這么多人被這個騙子愚弄。
@bobabooey4537:
Thats misinformation. Im not defending the coward con man but there isnt an educated economist on the planet that would call tariffs, taxes. They are not the same.
那是誤導信息。我不是在為這個懦弱的騙子辯護,但地球上沒有受過教育的經(jīng)濟學家會稱關(guān)稅為稅收。
它們不是一樣的。
@chriscatherwood4806:
@scottbigler9182American made will cost double Chinese made because of cost of labor.
美國制造的成本將是中國制造的兩倍,因為勞動力成本更高。