一輛特斯拉汽車在特朗普酒店外爆炸，馬斯克發(fā)聲：與車輛本身無關(guān)！
Tesla Cybertruck explodes outside Trump hotel in Las Vegas
譯文簡介
特斯拉Cybertruck在拉斯維加斯爆炸，馬斯克發(fā)聲：與車輛本身無關(guān)！
正文翻譯
At 8:40 am on January 1, 2025, a Tesla electric pickup truck exploded in front of the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, killing one person in the car and injuring seven people near the vehicle. The accident caused widespread concern. Witnesses said the explosion occurred when the back of the vehicle first produced a strong flash and sparks, followed by a violent explosion. The location of the accident, near the Trump Hotel in New York City, coincided with New Year's celebrations, and nearby fireworks may have further exacerbated the effect of the explosion.
美國時(shí)間2025年1月1日8時(shí)40分，一輛特斯拉電動(dòng)皮卡在位于美國內(nèi)華達(dá)州拉斯維加斯的特朗普酒店門前發(fā)生爆炸，造成車內(nèi)1人死亡，車輛附近7人受輕傷。 事故引起了廣泛關(guān)注。目擊者表示，爆炸發(fā)生時(shí)，車輛的后部先是產(chǎn)生了強(qiáng)烈的閃光和火花，隨后發(fā)生了劇烈的爆炸。事故地點(diǎn)位于紐約市，靠近特朗普大酒店，事發(fā)時(shí)恰逢新年慶?；顒?dòng)，附近的煙花爆竹可能進(jìn)一步加劇了爆炸的效果。
美國時(shí)間2025年1月1日8時(shí)40分，一輛特斯拉電動(dòng)皮卡在位于美國內(nèi)華達(dá)州拉斯維加斯的特朗普酒店門前發(fā)生爆炸，造成車內(nèi)1人死亡，車輛附近7人受輕傷。 事故引起了廣泛關(guān)注。目擊者表示，爆炸發(fā)生時(shí)，車輛的后部先是產(chǎn)生了強(qiáng)烈的閃光和火花，隨后發(fā)生了劇烈的爆炸。事故地點(diǎn)位于紐約市，靠近特朗普大酒店，事發(fā)時(shí)恰逢新年慶?；顒?dòng)，附近的煙花爆竹可能進(jìn)一步加劇了爆炸的效果。
Tesla founder Elon Musk later responded to the incident via social media, saying that the explosion had nothing to do with the Tesla vehicle itself. He pointed out that after a preliminary investigation, the explosion was caused by the owner of the car may have stored flammable items in the car, especially fireworks, resulting in an accident. In addition, Musk stressed that Tesla's battery system has been proven safe after several years of testing, and similar incidents are very rare.
特斯拉創(chuàng)始人埃隆·馬斯克隨后通過社交媒體回應(yīng)此事，表示爆炸與特斯拉電動(dòng)車本身無關(guān)。他指出，經(jīng)過初步調(diào)查，爆炸是由于車主可能在車內(nèi)存放了易燃物品，尤其是煙花，導(dǎo)致發(fā)生了意外。此外，馬斯克強(qiáng)調(diào)，特斯拉的電池系統(tǒng)在經(jīng)歷過數(shù)年的測試后被證明是安全的，類似事件非常罕見。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Police are also involved in the investigation, the initial cause of the explosion may be other fuel in the car or human factors, rather than battery problems. However, Tesla's battery system has also been the focus of public discussion several times due to its fire risk. Despite this, Musk insisted that the battery itself did not cause the accident, and the investigation into the accident is still ongoing.
警方也介入調(diào)查，初步認(rèn)為爆炸的起因可能是車內(nèi)的其他可燃物或人為因素，而不是電池問題。然而，特斯拉的電池系統(tǒng)也因其火災(zāi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)曾多次成為公眾討論的焦點(diǎn)。盡管如此，馬斯克堅(jiān)稱電池本身并未導(dǎo)致此次事故，事故調(diào)查仍在進(jìn)行中。
警方也介入調(diào)查，初步認(rèn)為爆炸的起因可能是車內(nèi)的其他可燃物或人為因素，而不是電池問題。然而，特斯拉的電池系統(tǒng)也因其火災(zāi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)曾多次成為公眾討論的焦點(diǎn)。盡管如此，馬斯克堅(jiān)稱電池本身并未導(dǎo)致此次事故，事故調(diào)查仍在進(jìn)行中。
The incident has sparked widespread debate about the safety of electric vehicles, vehicle regulations and emergency response in the event of an accident.
這起事件引發(fā)了對(duì)于電動(dòng)汽車安全性、車輛使用規(guī)范以及意外情況下應(yīng)急響應(yīng)的廣泛討論。
這起事件引發(fā)了對(duì)于電動(dòng)汽車安全性、車輛使用規(guī)范以及意外情況下應(yīng)急響應(yīng)的廣泛討論。
評(píng)論翻譯
很贊 ( 5 )
收藏
Placement and timing not a coincidence.
位置和時(shí)機(jī)不是巧合。
what timing?
什么時(shí)機(jī)？
@Baldor. timing regarding coming into the new presidency. looks like a message.
@Baldor. 關(guān)于進(jìn)入新總統(tǒng)職位的時(shí)機(jī)，看起來像是一個(gè)訊息。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Also first day of new year too?@Baldor.
也是新年的第一天，@Baldor.
It’s a pickup full of fireworks on new years. It’s not a coincidence, but it sure ain’t a conspiracy.
這是新年時(shí)滿載煙花的皮卡車。這不是巧合，但肯定不是陰謀。
Cybertruck, the Trump hotel – there’s lots of questions. Sure it's a message.
賽博皮卡，特朗普酒店——有很多問題?？隙ㄊ且粋€(gè)訊息。
agreed …..it’s going to be a bumpy ride folks
同意……接下來會(huì)有一段不平穩(wěn)的旅程，大家小心。
NOT the first time a Cyberturd has burst into flames. It happens quite frequently considering only 12k have been delivered (and recalled).
這不是賽博垃圾車第一次著火。考慮到僅交付了12,000輛（并且有被召回的情況），這種事發(fā)生得相當(dāng)頻繁。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
It is exactly a coincidence. A coincidence doesn't mean it's random. A coincidence is just two things or more happening at the same time or place or whatever you want. It is exactly the case here.
這正是巧合。巧合并不意味著隨機(jī)。巧合只是指兩件或更多事物在同一時(shí)間或地點(diǎn)發(fā)生，或者按你想的任何方式發(fā)生。這正是這里的情況。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Muy simbólico un auto fabricado por Elon frente al hotel de Donald
一輛由埃隆制造的汽車停在特朗普的酒店前，非常有象征意義。
step one: bursting flames. step two: multiple fireworks mortars explode. pal.
步驟一：爆炸的火焰。步驟二：多個(gè)煙花炮筒爆炸。伙計(jì)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Not really. I would typical imagine Cybertruck owner would pick Trump hotel to stay at. Considering how obnoxious people are who drive this garbage it's no surprise it's parked at the entrance.
其實(shí)不是。我通常會(huì)想象賽博皮卡的車主會(huì)選擇住在特朗普酒店?？紤]到那些開這垃圾車的人有多么令人討厭，它停在入口處也不足為奇。
Cybertruck, trump tower= Donald trump and Elon musk. Someone is sending a warning message to them.
賽博皮卡，特朗普大廈= 唐納德·特朗普和埃隆·馬斯克。有人在向他們發(fā)出警告信息。
Yes, but we don’t know who the message is from. There’s no reason for the driver to remain in the vehicle to send that message. I’m guessing it is a synchronicity from a cosmic source.
是的，但我們不知道這個(gè)訊息是誰發(fā)出的。司機(jī)沒有理由留在車內(nèi)發(fā)出這個(gè)訊息。我猜這是一種來自宇宙源的同步性。
Co-inkydink
巧合
Terrorism. They are in that area.
恐怖主義。他們?cè)谀莻€(gè)地區(qū)。
it's domestic terrorism ...
這是國內(nèi)恐怖主義...
What can we learn from this situation huus??
我們能從這個(gè)情況中學(xué)到什么，伙計(jì)？
@brennandefreitas3034 Don't buy a Tesla?
@brennandefreitas3034 不買特斯拉？
Yeah, the only way it could be more obvious would be if there were a Harris Waltz 2024 bumper sticker on the license plate but I hear it was a rental.
是的，唯一能讓它更加明顯的方式就是車牌上貼上哈里斯·沃爾茨2024的車貼，但我聽說那是輛租賃車。
I own a small business. I have an 8 camera high definition security system with sound and night vision that I bought over 10 years ago for around $500.00. Every time something like this happens the video footage looks like the camera and system is from 1964.
I’ve even seen bank robbery videos that are so horrible that you can’t even tell if the suspect is male or female.
我擁有一家小型企業(yè)。我有一個(gè)8攝像頭的高清安防系統(tǒng)，帶有聲音和夜視，十多年前花了大約500美元購買。每次發(fā)生類似事件時(shí)，視頻畫面看起來就像是1964年的攝像頭和系統(tǒng)。
我甚至看過一些銀行搶劫視頻，糟糕到無法判斷嫌疑人是男性還是女性。
Yes I agree. I have full colour in the middle of the night. People just put up cameras to put up cameras and have no idea on what can be installed.
是的，我同意。我在深夜也能看到全彩。人們只是為了安裝攝像頭而安裝攝像頭，根本不知道可以安裝什么。
in today's america the robber ain't sure either
在今天的美國，搶劫犯也不確定。
I agree with what you’re saying, wholeheartedly. But sometimes it’s the upload that distorts the footage.
I’m willing to guess that the original footage is high definition, they’re just showing us the uploaded footage.
我完全同意你的說法。但有時(shí)是上傳過程扭曲了畫面。
我猜原始視頻是高清的，他們只是給我們展示了上傳的視頻。
They must have extracted the video from a social network and not the original source.
他們一定是從社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)提取的視頻，而不是原始來源。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
You think Trump wants to upgrade the security system that was high end when it was installed 3 decades ago?
你認(rèn)為特朗普想要升級(jí)三十年前安裝的那套高端安防系統(tǒng)嗎？
Good point. This almost looks like a Hollywood production.
好觀點(diǎn)。這幾乎看起來像是好萊塢的制作。
there’s a lot of factors that might be at play.
1) they might have an HD camera that is covering the entire street, but the incident takes place in a very small portion of the frx (i.e. maybe they’re zoomed in on only a few thousand pixels instead of the 2 million 1080p pixels) The cameras are usually trying to cover a large area (e.g. bank, maybe there’s a camera covering the entire lobby or row of tellers, not 1 camera per teller)
2) maybe incident occurs at night, which a lot of cameras have trouble with.
3) they might have zoomed in & cropped to avoid showing gore. if someone is injured by the incident, or the driver’s flaming skull comes bouncing down the street 5 seconds after the explosion, that’s not going to make it on the news.
3) there might be several other cameras with better pictures where the footage hasn’t been recovered yet. (maybe.)
4) law enforcement might have better footage they have not released (e.g. police car dashcam?) because reasons.
這可能涉及許多因素。
1）他們可能有一個(gè)覆蓋整個(gè)街道的高清攝像頭，但事件發(fā)生在畫面中的一小部分（也就是說，也許他們只對(duì)幾千像素進(jìn)行了縮放，而不是1080p的200萬像素）。攝像頭通常試圖覆蓋大面積區(qū)域（例如銀行，也許有個(gè)攝像頭覆蓋整個(gè)大廳或一排出納員，而不是每個(gè)出納員一個(gè)攝像頭）。
2）也許事件發(fā)生在晚上，很多攝像頭在夜間表現(xiàn)不佳。
3）他們可能進(jìn)行了縮放和裁剪，以避免顯示血腥場面。如果有人在事件中受傷，或者司機(jī)的燃燒頭顱在爆炸后5秒鐘滾下街道，那可不會(huì)被放到新聞里。
3）可能有其他幾臺(tái)攝像頭拍攝了更清晰的畫面，但視頻還沒有恢復(fù)。（也許。）
4）執(zhí)法部門可能有更好的畫面，他們還沒有發(fā)布（例如警車行車記錄儀？），因?yàn)榉N種原因。
6) might be cropped to avoid showing recognizable landmarks or street signs to deter curious rubber-neckers.
7) news orgs might be offered better footage but could not secure rights because rights holder wants a million dollars.
8) Maybe the camera is from 1964. there was recently an incident in a Large American City that spends over $1 billion on public security. i saw a picture of police climbing a street lamp to, i kid you not, retrieve the film canister from the surveillance camera covering that street. i was like “how tf is anybody using film for surveillance in the 21st Century, how does that even work? doesn’t it run out of film?” and i went down this rabbit hole and it turns out yeah it is a thing and yeah it has not been upgraded in the decades this city has spent billions of dollars per year and it would not surprise me if it was actually installed in 1964.
on the bright side, the film probably has better resolution than HD digital. lol
5）可能有另一臺(tái)攝像頭拍攝的超清晰畫面，但不包括感興趣的區(qū)域（例如，只是爆炸產(chǎn)生的黃色光閃反射在某物上的畫面）。
6）可能裁剪了畫面，以避免顯示可識(shí)別的地標(biāo)或街道標(biāo)志，以防止好奇的旁觀者。
7）新聞機(jī)構(gòu)可能收到了更好的畫面，但由于版權(quán)方要求一百萬美元，他們未能獲得版權(quán)。
8）也許那攝像頭真的是1964年安裝的。最近在一個(gè)大美國城市發(fā)生了一起事件，這個(gè)城市每年花費(fèi)超過10億美元在公共安全上。我看到一張警察爬上路燈的照片，取回監(jiān)控?cái)z像頭中的膠片罐，真的是膠片。我當(dāng)時(shí)想，“在21世紀(jì)，怎么還用膠片做監(jiān)控？這怎么運(yùn)作的？不會(huì)用完膠片嗎？”我陷入了這個(gè)思考，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)它確實(shí)存在，而且這座城市每年花費(fèi)數(shù)十億美元，幾十年來它并沒有升級(jí)，可能它真的是在1964年安裝的。
好消息是，膠片的分辨率可能比高清數(shù)字還要好。哈哈
@yesthatkarim9601 now that’s what I call a breakdown. Great points (I think lol clearly you know a lot more about this stuff than I ever will)
@yesthatkarim9601 這才是我稱之為分析的內(nèi)容。很棒的觀點(diǎn)（我想，哈哈，顯然你比我了解這些事情多得多）
Yeah like Trump will have anything of quality.
是的，就像特朗普會(huì)擁有任何優(yōu)質(zhì)的東西一樣。
I wish these news reporters would just shut up and play the video
我希望這些新聞?dòng)浾吣荛]嘴，直接播放視頻。
Videos need context. Otherwise the wrong conclusions are easy to draw.
視頻需要背景，否則很容易得出錯(cuò)誤的結(jié)論。
Then everyone would be like. What happened? Why isn't someone narrating this.
然后大家就會(huì)問。發(fā)生了什么？為什么沒有人解說？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
What would be nice is if reporters would just state the facts. All major media are like this. Opinions are more important than facts.
最好的情況是記者們只陳述事實(shí)。所有主要媒體都是這樣的，觀點(diǎn)比事實(shí)更重要。
另外，我會(huì)檢查，但其他新聞來源說是1人死亡，幾人受傷，而不是10人或35人。
I want an official tag for videos on YouTube that are original footage with no commentary. It’s so hard just to find the original footage of things. I hate it. Everything has to be filtered by some news conglomerate. Just let me see it with my own eyes.
我希望YouTube上的視頻能有一個(gè)官方標(biāo)簽，標(biāo)明這是原始視頻，沒有解說。找到事物的原始畫面真的很難，我討厭這樣。所有的東西都必須經(jīng)過某個(gè)新聞集團(tuán)的篩選。只想讓我自己看。
They’re NOT “reporters” they’re scxt readers!
他們不是“記者”，他們是念稿子的人！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Gonna be a crazy year in America
將會(huì)是瘋狂的一年，美國。
Gonna be??? It already is
將會(huì)？？？已經(jīng)是了。
*Just another year in America.
又是普通的一年，美國。
You're not wrong
你說得沒錯(cuò)。
Four more years of chaos is right around the corner.
還有四年的混亂即將到來。
Seeds planted the last 4 years
過去四年埋下的種子。
Well if we remember what it was like his first term then yeah
嗯，如果我們記得他第一任期是什么樣子的話，那確實(shí)是。
Worse than the last 4?
比過去四年更糟糕？
They're doing this because of how weak the oval office right now. We'll see if it continues once Trump takes the reigns.
他們這么做是因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在的橢圓辦公室太弱了。等特朗普掌權(quán)后看看會(huì)不會(huì)繼續(xù)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Deagel report estimates a 100mil less citizens this year
軍事網(wǎng)站“迪葛爾”（?美國著名的武器研發(fā)咨詢公司，主要提供軍事信息服務(wù)?）的報(bào)告預(yù)測今年將減少1億公民。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Electric car batteries catch fire and/or explode, this was an axplosion. There is no indication that it was anything other than another faulty Tesla battery!
電動(dòng)汽車電池起火和/或爆炸，這是一次爆炸。沒有任何跡象表明這不是另一個(gè)故障的特斯拉電池！
hell is gonna break loose this yr just the beginning
今年地獄將崩塌，這只是開始。
Not really. People just do stupid things around New Years
并不是真的。人們只是喜歡在新年前后做一些愚蠢的事情。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Someone does not like that Elon Musk and Trump are working together.
有人不喜歡馬斯克和特朗普合作。
Yeah, and that someone is Trump. He’s already sick of Musk and talks about it every chance he gets.
是的，那個(gè)人就是特朗普。他已經(jīng)厭倦了馬斯克，并且抓住每個(gè)機(jī)會(huì)談?wù)撨@件事。
@nw42 Yeah and he'll be even more pist now that one of Elon’s stupid trucks just nearly burnt his hotel down lol.
是的，他可能更氣憤，因?yàn)轳R斯克的一輛愚蠢的卡車差點(diǎn)燒毀了他的酒店，哈哈。
LOL more like Phony Stark’s inventions are catastrophic failures.
笑死了，更像是偽鋼鐵俠的發(fā)明是一場災(zāi)難性的失敗。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
A lot of people don't. But this ain't helping.
很多人都不喜歡，但這沒什么幫助。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Everyone…
所有人……
Lol, got nothin "NADA" to do with Musk.
哈哈，與馬斯克無關(guān)。
First New Orleans now Vegas… what a wild start to 2025.
從新奧爾良到拉斯維加斯……2025年真是個(gè)瘋狂的開局。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Any bets on the next attack?...
要下注下一次襲擊嗎？
Funny... Putin's presidency started the same way.
有趣的是……普京的總統(tǒng)任期也是這樣開始的。
I've heard there have been more incidents on the NY subway as well.
我聽說紐約地鐵上也發(fā)生了更多事件。
That was a bomb. There is no reason the vehicle should have that much explosive potential without something added to it.
那是炸彈。車輛不應(yīng)該有如此大的爆炸威力，除非有東西被加進(jìn)去。
More like a blessing.
更像是個(gè)祝福。
Gigantic battery, maybe faulty. The explosion starts from under the car too I think.
巨大的電池，我認(rèn)為也許是有故障。爆炸也從車底開始。
You can look up NCM battery explosion. It's very powerful. Cybertruck has a supersize battery with a ton of special glue.
你可以查一下NCM電池爆炸，非常強(qiáng)力。Cybertruck有一個(gè)超大電池，里面用了大量特殊膠水。
It's a Tesla, they have a tendency to explode at random. This one had fireworks on New Year's Eve, it seems unfortunate.
這是特斯拉，它們有隨時(shí)爆炸的傾向。這輛車在新年前夜發(fā)生了煙花爆炸，似乎很不幸。
It's literally just fireworks exploding. You can see the stars in other videos. You can hear the whistles and booms.
這實(shí)際上只是煙花爆炸。你可以在其他視頻中看到星星，聽到口哨聲和爆炸聲。
Do trucks have trunks?
賽博皮卡有后備廂嗎？
@wadestanton
賽博皮卡有一個(gè)卷頂?shù)呢浵渖w，可以打開或關(guān)閉。它在卡車鎖定時(shí)會(huì)自動(dòng)鎖定（無論是打開還是關(guān)閉）。
它也可以通過應(yīng)用程序開關(guān)（現(xiàn)在我開始想這在租賃的汽車中是怎么工作的……）。
有趣的是，文檔中有一條警告：切勿將易燃溶劑、化學(xué)品或液體裝入貨箱或底部隔間。這樣做可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致泄漏，或使氣體積聚，造成損害、嚴(yán)重傷害甚至死亡。
Tesla cyber trucks do have trunks. They’ve showed it on the news.
特斯拉賽博皮卡確實(shí)有后備廂。新聞里有展示過。
Same place for the high cap battery and that's not a battery explosion.
電池的高容量位置在那里，但那不是電池爆炸。
Dude! It looks like they used a lot of fireworks to ensure that car exploded. That was intentional.
兄弟！看起來他們用了很多煙花確保那輛車爆炸。這是故意的。
They blow up like that when they blow up. Gasoline is way safer that's why electric cars were abandoned before. Tesla has the highest death rate of any car brand.
它們爆炸就是這樣爆炸的。汽油車更安全，這也是為什么電動(dòng)汽車曾被放棄。特斯拉的死亡率是所有汽車品牌中最高的。
@user-ur3gr2qs6i
Yes, these trucks blow up, but not like that. I’ve seen it, these trucks do not catch flame this fast.
是的，這些皮卡會(huì)爆炸，但不是那樣。我見過，皮卡不會(huì)這么快著火。
It was 100% intentional, how is this being debated? bro put fireworks in his car and blew himself up, it’s been confirmed, use the internet.
這絕對(duì)是故意的，怎么還在爭論這個(gè)？這哥們把煙花放進(jìn)車?yán)锇炎约赫?，已?jīng)證實(shí)了，去用用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)。
@Toader21
Well if the internet says it, it must be true.
如果是互聯(lián)網(wǎng)說的，那一定就是真的。
@twelfthdoctor4402
Sure man, go read the stars and get your answers from that if that's what you're looking for I understand what you're attempting to argue, but it’s not “the internet” telling me answers, it’s the MULTIPLE investigations from MULTIPLE authorities and sources telling me the answer. The internet is the MEDIUM to get the information. Can’t really believe I just had to explain that, but at the same time, based on what you said, it does kinda make sense that you needed this explanation.
好吧，兄弟，如果你想從星星那里得到答案，那就去看吧，我理解你試圖爭論的點(diǎn)，但并不是“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)”給我答案，而是多個(gè)機(jī)構(gòu)和來源的多次調(diào)查給我答案?；ヂ?lián)網(wǎng)只是獲取信息的媒介。真不敢相信我還需要解釋這個(gè)，但同時(shí)，基于你說的，似乎你確實(shí)需要這個(gè)解釋。
This is just how Lithium-Ion batteries explode. The white smoke, too.
這就是鋰電池爆炸的方式，白煙也是如此。
It came from the batteries on the bottom. And it's New Year's. A lot of people have fireworks.
它來自底部的電池。而且是新年，很多人有煙花。
@hanna-liminal
That is not how lithium-ion batteries explode. When EV car batteries "explode," it’s more like they rapidly catch fire. This huge sudden explosive force is not typical of a li-ion battery fire.
這不是鋰電池爆炸的方式。電動(dòng)汽車電池“爆炸”時(shí)，更像是它們迅速著火。這種突如其來的巨大爆炸力并不典型于鋰電池火災(zāi)。
The electric battery is made full of tiny batteries, if only one of them overheats or is damaged, the whole bunch will collapse.
電動(dòng)電池由許多小電池組成，如果其中一個(gè)過熱或損壞，整個(gè)電池組都會(huì)崩潰。
@alanqueiroz9957
To be fair, that's what battery management systems are for, but the Cybertruck has been having near constant safety recalls since leaving the factory.
公平地說，電池管理系統(tǒng)就是為此而設(shè)計(jì)的，但賽博皮卡自從離開工廠以來幾乎一直在進(jìn)行安全召回。
Obviously.
顯然。
That's what happens when lithium, from the big lithium batteries in electric vehicles, gets in contact with air/oxygen.
這就是當(dāng)電動(dòng)汽車中的大鋰電池與空氣/氧氣接觸時(shí)發(fā)生的事情。
Maybe he was transporting some fireworks that somehow were ignited? Seems the driver was in it, maybe he was smoking?
也許他運(yùn)送了一些煙花，不知道怎么著火了？看起來司機(jī)也在車?yán)?，也許他在抽煙？
The secondary "firework" like things were definitely battery, but that initial one was a bomb.
第二次類似“煙花”的爆炸絕對(duì)是電池，但最初的那個(gè)爆炸是炸彈。
That’s what a large lithium battery looks like when it explodes.
那就是大型鋰電池爆炸時(shí)的樣子。
@user-ur3gr2qs6i
That's cause it was made by Elon, not fundamentally because of electric cars.
那是因?yàn)樗怯神R斯克制造的，而不是電動(dòng)汽車本身的問題。
Everyone has been saying fireworks because it looked like fireworks at first. Guess what? It was fireworks! Bravo geniuses.
每個(gè)人都在說是煙花，因?yàn)橐婚_始看起來像是煙花。猜猜怎么著？它就是煙花！天才們，干得好！
People really over analyze everything nowadays.
現(xiàn)在的人真是把一切都過度分析了。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Man, they need to recall all Teslas.
兄弟，他們需要召回所有特斯拉。
"America is at war with itself"
“美國正在與自己作戰(zhàn)”
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
We're the idiot country that voted for another 4 years of Trump
我們是那個(gè)傻乎乎的國家，選出了特朗普連任四年。
@tonyrodriguez_
So you are expressing support for terror groups then.
那你就是在支持恐怖組織了嗎？
It's good vs evil！
這是善與惡的較量！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
@tonyrodriguez_
In the end, most of those that voted for Trump wanted to get the prices down. As stupid as I think it is to vote Trump in again, that's what I'm trying to see. Otherwise, I just see this craziness in America I can't stand.
最后，大多數(shù)支持特朗普的人是想要降低物價(jià)。雖然我認(rèn)為再次選特朗普很愚蠢，但我能理解他們的想法。否則，我只能看到美國一直處于瘋狂中，這真的受不了。
@babu357
Trump didn’t have a single war, barely any tax problems, great foreign policy, also no Americans were harmed in the Middle East for most of his time in office.
特朗普沒有打過一場戰(zhàn)爭，幾乎沒有稅務(wù)問題，外交政策也很出色，在他任期的大部分時(shí)間里沒有美國人在中東受到傷害。
@TMRN0ICE
Over a million Americans died due to his incompetence.
由于他的無能，超過一百萬美國人死亡。
Voted for Trump and got Elon instead.
選了特朗普，結(jié)果卻得到了馬斯克。
@vladthe3rd414
Elon found the weak lix and exploited it.
馬斯克找到了弱點(diǎn)并加以利用。
Because he took office after Obama fixed the housing crisis. Obama left him with a good economy.
因?yàn)樗窃趭W巴馬解決了住房危機(jī)后上任的，奧巴馬留下了一個(gè)良好的經(jīng)濟(jì)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
@jacquelineglitter4328
Ahem, a lot of businesses going bankrupt? The hoods got more out of control, btw, and I know this because my family lived in those areas during those times, also Russia was on a roll trying to take over countries.
咳咳，很多企業(yè)破產(chǎn)了？順便說一下，貧民區(qū)越來越失控，我知道這一點(diǎn)，因?yàn)槲业募胰嗽谀切r(shí)期住在那里，而且俄羅斯在積極吞并其他國家。
#BUILD UP OF HYDROGEN GAS <---- Li-ion Batteries absolutely DO explode, it's already happened several times, since most have no knowledge of these events (and try to hide themselves from the information, the news reports, and the associated videos that have previously showed this) they naturally think this doesn't happen.
#氫氣積聚<---- 鋰電池絕對(duì)會(huì)爆炸，這種情況已經(jīng)發(fā)生過好幾次了，由于大多數(shù)人對(duì)這些事件不了解（并試圖回避信息、新聞報(bào)道以及之前顯示過的相關(guān)視頻），他們自然會(huì)認(rèn)為這不可能發(fā)生。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
I thought that too, I was like; I'm pretty sure lithium just burns. I looked up videos and I was wrong, they can explode. Good examples are e-cig battery failures. Those things are basically flashbangs. Now imagine one the size of a car? I think it could be the guy had something else in his car, maybe fireworks and something went wrong. It IS New Year, which would make sense why he had fireworks in the first place. Maybe it wasn't intentional?
我也這么想，我想，鋰電池最多不就是燃燒嗎？我查了一下視頻，結(jié)果我錯(cuò)了，它們也能爆炸。很好的例子就是電子煙電池的故障，那些東西基本上是閃光彈?，F(xiàn)在想象一下如果是車那么大？我覺得可能車?yán)镞€有其他東西，可能是煙花，出了問題。畢竟是新年，也能解釋為什么他一開始會(huì)有煙花。也許這不是故意的？
One just blew up in Port Miami. They very much do explode sometimes.
剛剛有一個(gè)在邁阿密港爆炸了。它們確實(shí)有時(shí)候會(huì)爆炸。